The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT OSS 120B High vs LFM2.5-VL-3B

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

OpenAI · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFBench), while LFM2.5-VL-3B is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT OSS 120B High

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
Released
Aug 2025
Aug 2026
License
Apache 2.0
LFM Open License v1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFBench), while LFM2.5-VL-3B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

113.7B diff

GPT OSS 120B High has 113.7B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 3639.4% larger.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
116.8Bparameters
Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B High
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT OSS 120B High specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only GPT OSS 120B High specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B High does not.

LFM2.5-VL-3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT OSS 120B High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT OSS 120B High is licensed under Apache 2.0, while LFM2.5-VL-3B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT OSS 120B High

Apache 2.0

Open weights

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05, while LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 12 months newer than GPT OSS 120B High.

GPT OSS 120B High

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT OSS 120B High and LFM2.5-VL-3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT OSS 120B High
✓ Preferred
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B High vs LFM2.5-VL-3B.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B High or LFM2.5-VL-3B?

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B High is made by OpenAI and LFM2.5-VL-3B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT OSS 120B High compare to LFM2.5-VL-3B in benchmarks?

GPT OSS 120B High scores AIME 2025: 92.5%, MMMLU: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.9%, GPQA: 80.9%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%. LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT OSS 120B High and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

GPT OSS 120B High supports 131K tokens and LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT OSS 120B High and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT OSS 120B High and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

GPT OSS 120B High is developed by OpenAI and LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI.