Model Comparison

GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Comparing GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

108.5B diff

GPT OSS 120B High has 108.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 1308.9% larger.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
116.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B High
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT OSS 120B High specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only GPT OSS 120B High specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B High does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT OSS 120B High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GPT OSS 120B High

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

GPT OSS 120B High is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

GPT OSS 120B High

Aug 5, 2025

8 months ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

GPT OSS 120B High (OpenAI) and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
GPT OSS 120B High scores AIME 2025: 92.5%, MMMLU: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.9%, GPQA: 80.9%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.
GPT OSS 120B High supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT OSS 120B High is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.