Model Comparison

GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 3.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT OSS 120B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($1.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

GPT OSS 120B

Input tokens$0.09

Output tokens$0.45

Best providerDeepinfra

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$1.49

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

119.2B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has 119.2B more parameters than GPT OSS 120B, making it 102.1% larger.

GPT OSS 120B

116.8Bparameters

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

236.0Bparameters

116.8B

GPT OSS 120B

236.0B

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT OSS 120B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

GPT OSS 120B

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT OSS 120B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 2 months newer than GPT OSS 120B.

GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

GPT OSS 120B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

OpenAI

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.49/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

GPT OSS 120B

View details

OpenAI

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Higher MMLU score (90.0% vs 88.8%)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	GPT OSS 120B	Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT OSS 120B compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%.

Is GPT OSS 120B cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT OSS 120B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT OSS 120B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.09 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT OSS 120B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.