The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B leads the LLM Stats Score 17.4 to -0.5.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 30B A3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.4 to -0.5, ranking #215 overall.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.4 and ranks #215 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.5
#327
17.4
#215
-0.6
#321
17.7
#206
11.1
#159
9.8
#165
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Qwen3 30B A3B
-0.8#297
19.6#163
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Base · 8 for Qwen3 30B A3B

2 shared

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2024), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (Arena Hard).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.3B diff

Qwen3 30B A3B has 22.3B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 273.3% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 30B A3B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 30B A3B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 30B A3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 0 month newer than Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.4 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Qwen3 30B A3B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Base
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 30B A3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Base or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B leads the LLM Stats Score 17.4 to -0.5. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Base compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.5 vs 17.4), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.