Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (by IBM) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is roughly 4.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 4.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 8.5x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 15 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Provider Availability

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

IBM
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (IBM) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is Granite 3.3 8B Instruct cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via replicate. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $1.25/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons