Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Kimi K3Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (by IBM) and Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is roughly 12.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 12.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 6.0x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 30.0x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2792.0B diff

Kimi K3 has 2792.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 34900.0% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2800.0B
Kimi K3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 15 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

2 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Kimi K3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K3's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Kimi K3

Provider Availability

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Kimi K3?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (IBM) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

Is Granite 3.3 8B Instruct cheaper than Kimi K3?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via replicate. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $3.00/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Kimi K3?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.