The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 15.2 to 2.6.

IBM · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.2 to 2.6, ranking #219 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.2 and ranks #219 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.6
#302
15.2
#219
3.0
#291
15.5
#213
11.3
#151
5.8
#188
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
3.0#280
18.3#174
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

4 shared

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, Arena Hard, HumanEval+, IFEval).

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has 6.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 75.0% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is 0 month newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (2024-04-01).

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

11 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 15.2 to 2.6. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.6 vs 15.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.