The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 2.4 to -3.2.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 2.4 to -3.2, ranking #331 overall.

The models split the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 2.4 and ranks #331 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.4
#331
-3.2
#359
2.8
#320
-3.2
#351
11.1
#172
6.4
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 4
2 of 4
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
2.7#295
-2.4#316
1.4#188
-5.9#220
1.4#179
-7.2#207
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

4 shared

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, TruthfulQA), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has 1.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 14.3% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 2.4 to -3.2. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.4 vs -3.2), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.