The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Inkling 2 Small

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.2 to -6.2.

IBM · Thinking Machines Lab · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Inkling 2 Small leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.2 to -6.2, ranking #39 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Inkling 2 Small

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.2 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Inkling 2 Small
Thinking Machines Lab
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-6.2
#402
47.2
#39
Reasoning
-6.2
#391
47.9
#24
Coding
2.8
#258
36.3
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 11 for Inkling 2 Small

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Inkling 2 Smalldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

587.0B diff

Inkling 2 Small has 587.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 8385.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
594.0Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
594.0B
Inkling 2 Small

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Inkling 2 Small specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Inkling 2 Small supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Inkling 2 Small can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Inkling 2 Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Inkling 2 Small uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Inkling 2 Small

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Inkling 2 Small was released on 2026-11-05.

Inkling 2 Small is 18 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Inkling 2 Small

Nov 5, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Inkling 2 Small side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Inkling 2 Small
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Inkling 2 Small.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Inkling 2 Small?

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.2 to -6.2. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Inkling 2 Small is made by Thinking Machines Lab. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Inkling 2 Small in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Inkling 2 Small scores GPQA: 93.0%, BrowseComp: 90.2%, CharXiv-R: 85.6%, MCP Atlas: 85.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 82.2%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Inkling 2 Small?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Inkling 2 Small supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Inkling 2 Small?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.2 vs 47.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Inkling 2 Small?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Inkling 2 Small is developed by Thinking Machines Lab.

Related comparisons