The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct are closely matched at -5.5 and -6.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -5.5 and -6.1.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-5.5
#361
-6.1
#363
-5.5
#351
-6.7
#357
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.01 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.02 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
-5.8#318
-3.7#313
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 15 for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

3 shared

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GSM8k, IFEval, MMLU).

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.8B diff

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has 3.8B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 118.1% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
3.2Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
3.2B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 7 months newer than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

7mo newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -5.5 and -6.1. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Llama 3.2 3B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores NIH/Multi-needle: 84.7%, ARC-C: 78.6%, GSM8k: 77.7%, IFEval: 77.4%, HellaSwag: 69.8%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.5 vs -6.1), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is developed by Meta.