The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 leads the LLM Stats Score 46.4 to -5.5.

IBM · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mistral Large 4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.4 to -5.5, ranking #33 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Mistral Large 4

  • overall performance matters — it scores 46.4 and ranks #33 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.5
#374
46.4
#33
Reasoning
-5.5
#364
44.0
#42
Coding
2.9
#234
36.5
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.68 / M
Output price
— / M
$2.09 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 18 for Mistral Large 4

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Mistral Large 4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1043.0B diff

Mistral Large 4 has 1043.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 14900.0% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4
1.1Tparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
1050.0B
Mistral Large 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Large 4 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Large 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Mistral Large 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Large 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Mistral Large 4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Mistral Large 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Mistral Large 4 was released on 2026-10-06.

Mistral Large 4 is 17 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

Mistral Large 4

Oct 6, 2026

1 days ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Mistral Large 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Mistral Large 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Mistral Large 4.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 leads the LLM Stats Score 46.4 to -5.5. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Mistral Large 4 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Mistral Large 4 in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Mistral Large 4 scores B3 AI Security Benchmark: 93.3%, CyBench: 93.0%, SciCode: 91.8%, KORABench: 84.5%, CyberGym: 82.0%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Mistral Large 4?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral Large 4 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Mistral Large 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.5 vs 46.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Mistral Large 4?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Mistral Large 4 is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons