The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Hermes 3 70B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 3.9.

IBM · Nous Research · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 3.9, ranking #156 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Hermes 3 70B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $1.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
3.9
#289
21.8
#165
1.0
#298
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.35 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.40 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Hermes 3 70B
25.6#103
-0.6#289
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 17 for Hermes 3 70B

3 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 1 benchmark (IFBench).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

40.0B diff

Hermes 3 70B has 40.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 133.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
70.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
70.0B
Hermes 3 70B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Hermes 3 70B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Hermes 3 70B specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input131,072 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Hermes 3 70B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 25 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

2.0yr newer
Hermes 3 70B

Aug 15, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Hermes 3 70B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Hermes 3 70B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Hermes 3 70B.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Hermes 3 70B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 3.9. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Hermes 3 70B is made by Nous Research. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Hermes 3 70B in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Hermes 3 70B scores MT-Bench: 89.9%, HellaSwag: 88.2%, BoolQ: 88.0%, PIQA: 84.4%, Winogrande: 83.2%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Hermes 3 70B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Hermes 3 70B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Hermes 3 70B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 3.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Hermes 3 70B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Hermes 3 70B is developed by Nous Research.