The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Sarvam-30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Sarvam-30B are closely matched at 24.0 and 19.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Sarvam-30B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 19.9.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Sarvam-30B

  • you are already invested in the Sarvam AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
19.9
#186
21.8
#165
19.6
#183
9.6
#159
6.2
#180
7.9
#124
-0.7
#158
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 7
3 of 7
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Sarvam-30B
25.6#103
23.9#118
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 14 for Sarvam-30B

7 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Arena-Hard v2, HMMT25, LiveCodeBench v6, SWE-Bench Verified), while Sarvam-30B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Sarvam-30B has 0.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 0.0% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B
30.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0B
Sarvam-30B

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Sarvam-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Sarvam-30B was released on 2026-03-06.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 6 months newer than Sarvam-30B.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

5mo newer
Sarvam-30B

Mar 6, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Sarvam-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Sarvam-30B.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Sarvam-30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Sarvam-30B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 19.9. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Sarvam-30B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Sarvam-30B in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Sarvam-30B scores MATH-500: 97.0%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MBPP: 92.7%, HumanEval: 92.1%, MMLU: 85.1%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Sarvam-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 19.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Sarvam-30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Sarvam-30B is developed by Sarvam AI.