The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs IBM Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and IBM Granite 4.2 8B are closely matched at 15.6 and 19.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and IBM Granite 4.2 8B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 19.9.

In the 13 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 8B wins 12; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 8B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 12 of 13 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
19.9
#185
12.0
#234
17.6
#193
-6.7
#247
2.8
#210
2.0
#152
2.6
#150
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 13
12 of 13
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
13.7#216
21.2#141
5.3#144
4.9#145
-2.2#108
7.8#86
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 8B

13 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL-V4), while IBM Granite 4.2 8B is better at 12 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Arena-Hard v2, GPQA, HMMT25, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, ProfBench, RULER 128k, RULER 64k, SciCode, TAU3-Bench).

IBM Granite 4.2 8B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 8B has 5.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 166.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
8.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
8.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 8B

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 8B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-08-25.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

IBM Granite 4.2 8B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and IBM Granite 4.2 8B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs IBM Granite 4.2 8B.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or IBM Granite 4.2 8B?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and IBM Granite 4.2 8B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 19.9. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and IBM Granite 4.2 8B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to IBM Granite 4.2 8B in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. IBM Granite 4.2 8B scores AIME 2025: 86.7%, RULER 64k: 81.0%, IFBench: 79.3%, HMMT25: 78.3%, MMLU-Pro: 74.0%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and IBM Granite 4.2 8B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 19.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.