The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Grok-2 mini

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.8.

IBM · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.8, ranking #213 overall.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-2 mini

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
8.8
#258
12.0
#234
8.4
#261
-6.7
#247
6.0
#182
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Grok-2 mini
13.7#216
16.0#202
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 8 for Grok-2 mini

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Grok-2 mini is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-Pro).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Grok-2 mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-2 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Grok-2 mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Grok-2 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Grok-2 mini was released on 2024-08-13.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 25 months newer than Grok-2 mini.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

2.0yr newer
Grok-2 mini

Aug 13, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-2 mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Grok-2 mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Grok-2 mini.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Grok-2 mini?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.8. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Grok-2 mini is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Grok-2 mini in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Grok-2 mini scores DocVQA: 93.2%, MMLU: 86.2%, HumanEval: 85.7%, MATH: 73.0%, MMLU-Pro: 72.0%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-2 mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 8.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-2 mini?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Grok-2 mini is developed by xAI.