The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct are closely matched at 15.6 and 14.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 14.9.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.89/M input and $0.89/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
14.9
#217
12.0
#234
14.0
#218
-6.7
#247
11.6
#144
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.89 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.89 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
13.7#216
19.5#159
5.3#144
30.8#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 18 for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-Pro).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

402.0B diff

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 402.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 13400.0% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
405.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
405.0B
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.1 405B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.1 405B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 25 months newer than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

2.1yr newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 14.9. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Llama 3.1 405B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores ARC-C: 96.9%, GSM8k: 96.8%, API-Bank: 92.0%, Multilingual MGSM (CoT): 91.6%, HumanEval: 89.0%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 14.9), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is developed by Meta.