The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 5.4.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 5.4, ranking #213 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 3B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
5.4
#283
12.0
#234
6.8
#270
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.35 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
13.7#216
11.8#230
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 13 for Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

1 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

87.0B diff

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct has 87.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 2900.0% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
90.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
90.0B
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 90B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 90B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct uses Llama 3.2.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.2

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 23 months newer than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

1.9yr newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 5.4. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Llama 3.2 90B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct scores AI2D: 92.3%, DocVQA: 90.1%, MGSM: 86.9%, MMLU: 86.0%, ChartQA: 85.5%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 5.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 3.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is developed by Meta.