The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking are closely matched at 15.6 and 16.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 16.4.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
16.4
#207
12.0
#234
17.3
#196
2.0
#152
5.2
#132
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 6
4 of 6
Input price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Output price
— / M
$2.09 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
13.7#216
19.1#163
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 50 for Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

6 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HMMT25, LiveCodeBench v6), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Arena-Hard v2, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has 6.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 200.0% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
9.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
9.0B
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 11 months newer than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

11mo newer
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 16.4. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 16.4), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.