Model Comparison

Grok-1.5 vs Command R+Which is better in 2026?

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Grok-1.5 vs Command R+ — which is better?

Grok-1.5 (by xAI) and Command R+ (by Cohere) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU), while Command R+ is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Grok-1.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU), while Command R+ is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Command R+ uses CC BY-NC.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30.

Command R+ is 5 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.2 years ago

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GSM8k score (90.0% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (81.3% vs 75.7%)
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-1.5
Cohere
Command R+

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs Command R+.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or Command R+?

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and Command R+ is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to Command R+ in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5 and Command R+?

Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens and Command R+ supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and Command R+?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs CC BY-NC). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and Command R+?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and Command R+ is developed by Cohere.