The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5 vs Kimi-k1.5

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.2 to -2.6.

xAI · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.2 to -2.6, ranking #226 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi-k1.5 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.2 and ranks #226 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.6
#348
17.2
#226
-2.2
#338
16.4
#223
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Grok-1.5
Kimi-k1.5
4.9#278
20.2#162
-5.2#208
11.0#118
-2.6#167
14.7#99
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Grok-1.5 · 9 for Kimi-k1.5

3 shared

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 3 benchmarks (MathVista, MMLU, MMMU).

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-1.5 does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Kimi-k1.5 is 10 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.5 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5 and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or Kimi-k1.5?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.2 to -2.6. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and Kimi-k1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.6 vs 17.2), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and Kimi-k1.5?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.