Grok-1.5 vs Nova Pro Comparison

Comparing Grok-1.5 and Nova Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Pro is better at 7 benchmarks (DocVQA, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, MMMU).

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-1.5
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-1.5 does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Pro is 8 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.0 years ago

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.3 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher DocVQA score (93.5% vs 85.6%)
Higher GPQA score (46.9% vs 35.9%)
Higher GSM8k score (94.8% vs 90.0%)
Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 74.1%)
Higher MATH score (76.6% vs 50.6%)
Higher MMLU score (85.9% vs 81.3%)
Higher MMMU score (61.7% vs 53.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-1.5
Amazon
Nova Pro