The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5 vs o1-mini

o1-mini leads the LLM Stats Score 10.1 to -2.5.

xAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1-mini leads the overall LLM Stats Score 10.1 to -2.5, ranking #255 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1-mini wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose o1-mini

  • overall performance matters — it scores 10.1 and ranks #255 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.5
#328
10.1
#255
-2.0
#318
10.3
#248
-0.8
#237
14.5
#126
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$12.00 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-1.5
o1-mini
5.4#266
11.0#239
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Grok-1.5 · 6 for o1-mini

3 shared

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-mini is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU).

o1-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1-mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only o1-mini specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12.

o1-mini is 6 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.4 years ago

o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5 and o1-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5
✓ Preferred
o1-mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs o1-mini.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or o1-mini?

o1-mini leads the LLM Stats Score 10.1 to -2.5. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and o1-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to o1-mini in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5 and o1-mini?

Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens and o1-mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and o1-mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.5 vs 10.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and o1-mini?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and o1-mini is developed by OpenAI.