The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 7.8 to -2.5.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 7.8 to -2.5, ranking #273 overall.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 7.8 and ranks #273 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.5
#328
7.8
#273
-2.0
#318
7.3
#271
-0.8
#237
9.5
#164
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 6
6 of 6
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Grok-1.5
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
5.4#266
16.7#194
5.2#166
9.7#141
5.2#151
9.5#129
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Grok-1.5 · 18 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

6 shared

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is 6 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.4 years ago

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 7.8 to -2.5. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.5 vs 7.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.