Model Comparison

Grok-1.5V vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Grok-1.5V outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AI2D), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 6 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista, MMMU, RealWorldQA, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-1.5V and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5V is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 12 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.1 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Higher AI2D score (88.3% vs 83.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher ChartQA score (85.3% vs 76.1%)
Higher DocVQA score (95.2% vs 85.6%)
Higher MathVista score (67.9% vs 52.8%)
Higher MMMU score (59.2% vs 53.6%)
Higher RealWorldQA score (70.3% vs 68.7%)
Higher TextVQA score (84.4% vs 78.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5V vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-1.5V is made by xAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%, ChartQA: 85.3%.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.