The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-2 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Grok-2 leads the LLM Stats Score 11.5 to -3.0.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 11.5 to -3.0, ranking #247 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-2 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 11.5 and ranks #247 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
11.5
#247
-3.0
#331
11.5
#243
-3.0
#322
9.3
#168
6.6
#181
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Grok-2
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
18.4#170
-1.9#300
18.8#89
-5.5#208
18.8#76
-6.8#193
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Grok-2 · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

4 shared

Grok-2 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-2 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Grok-2 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-2
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Grok-2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-2

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-2 was released on 2024-08-13, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is 1 month newer than Grok-2.

Grok-2

Aug 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-2
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-2 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Grok-2 or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Grok-2 leads the LLM Stats Score 11.5 to -3.0. Grok-2 is made by xAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-2 compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Grok-2 scores DocVQA: 93.6%, HumanEval: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, MATH: 76.1%, MMLU-Pro: 75.5%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Grok-2 supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.5 vs -3.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Grok-2 is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.