Model Comparison
Grok-3 Mini vs LongCat-Flash-ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Grok-3 Mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-3 Mini is 1.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Grok-3 Mini vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking — which is better?
Grok-3 Mini (by xAI) and LongCat-Flash-Thinking (by Meituan) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Grok-3 Mini outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while LongCat-Flash-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok-3 Mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Grok-3 Mini is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Choose Grok-3 Mini if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
Choose LongCat-Flash-Thinking if…
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-3 Mini outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while LongCat-Flash-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-3 Mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as LongCat-Flash-Thinking ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.4x cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Thinking ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, LongCat-Flash-Thinking is more expensive than Grok-3 Mini.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. LongCat-Flash-Thinking can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-3 Mini is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Thinking does not.
Grok-3 Mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-3 Mini
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-3 Mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 Mini was released on 2025-02-17, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
LongCat-Flash-Thinking is 7 months newer than Grok-3 Mini.
Feb 17, 2025
1.4 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
10 months ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-3 Mini's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-Flash-Thinking's cutoff date.
Nov 2024
—
Provider Availability
Grok-3 Mini is available from xAI. LongCat-Flash-Thinking is available from Meituan.
Grok-3 Mini
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok-3 Mini and LongCat-Flash-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-3 Mini vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking.