The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs Grok-3

Grok-3 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.4 to -0.5. Command R+ is 13.7x cheaper per token.

Cohere · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 30.4 to -0.5, ranking #118 overall.

On price, Command R+ is roughly 13.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • cost matters — it's about 13.7x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 30.4 and ranks #118 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.5
#328
30.4
#118
-0.8
#324
30.1
#118
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.25 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
128,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Command R+
Grok-3
-2.2#308
29.3#87
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 5 for Grok-3

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Grok-3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 12.0x cheaper than Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x cheaper than Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-3 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
xAI
Grok-3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Grok-3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Grok-3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17.

Grok-3 is 6 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.1 years ago

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.6 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

Grok-3

Nov 2024

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Grok-3 is available from xAI.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Grok-3

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Grok-3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Grok-3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Grok-3.

Which is better, Command R+ or Grok-3?

Grok-3 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.4 to -0.5. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Grok-3 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to Grok-3 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Grok-3?

Command R+ is 12.0x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Grok-3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Grok-3?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Grok-3 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Grok-3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.5 vs 30.4), input pricing ($0.25 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Grok-3?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Grok-3 is developed by xAI.