Model Comparison

Grok-3 vs Gemini 2.0 FlashWhich is better in 2026?

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 34.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Grok-3 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash — which is better?

Grok-3 (by xAI) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Grok-3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMMU), while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 2.0 Flash is roughly 34.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.0 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Grok-3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if…

  • cost matters — it's about 34.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Grok-3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMMU), while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-3 is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok-3's 128,000 tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash can generate longer responses up to 8,192 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-3 and Gemini 2.0 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

Grok-3 is 3 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.3 years ago

2mo newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Gemini 2.0 Flash has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Grok-3 has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-17), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash (2024-08-01).

Grok-3

Nov 2024

3 mo newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

Grok-3 is available from xAI. Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google.

Grok-3

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Higher GPQA score (84.6% vs 62.1%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.4% vs 35.1%)
Higher MMMU score (78.0% vs 70.7%)
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
xAIGrok-3
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-3
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-3 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Which is better, Grok-3 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-3 is made by xAI and Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok-3 compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash in benchmarks?

Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%. Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%.

Is Grok-3 cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 30.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-3 and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Grok-3 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-3 and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-3 and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Grok-3 is developed by xAI and Gemini 2.0 Flash is developed by Google.

Related comparisons