Model Comparison

Grok-3 vs Gemma 3n E4B

Comparing Grok-3 and Gemma 3n E4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-3 and Gemma 3n E4B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-3 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Grok-3 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-3 and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B is 4 months newer than Grok-3.

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Gemma 3n E4B has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Grok-3 has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-17), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B (2024-06-01).

Grok-3

Nov 2024

5 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Google
xAIGrok-3
GoogleGemma 3n E4B
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-3
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-3 vs Gemma 3n E4B

Grok-3 (xAI) and Gemma 3n E4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.
Grok-3 supports 128K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Grok-3 is developed by xAI and Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google.