Model Comparison
Grok-3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 12.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Grok-3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking — which is better?
Grok-3 (by xAI) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Grok-3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is roughly 12.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok-3 also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Grok-3 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if…
- cost matters — it's about 12.3x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok-3 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok-3 accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.
Grok-3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 7 months newer than Grok-3.
Feb 17, 2025
1.3 years ago
Sep 10, 2025
9 months ago
6mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date.
Nov 2024
—
Provider Availability
Grok-3 is available from xAI. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.
Grok-3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Grok-3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.