Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Mercury 3
Comparing Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Mercury 3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
xAI · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Mercury 3 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Mercury 3 is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
- you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window
Choose Mercury 3
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
0 reported for Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning · 12 for Mercury 3
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Mercury 3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.35/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is more expensive than Mercury 3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Mercury 3's 1,000,000 tokens. Mercury 3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is limited to 30,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
Mercury 3
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning was released on 2025-11-17, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.
Mercury 3 is 11 months newer than Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning.
Nov 17, 2025
11 months ago
Oct 19, 2026
1 days ago
11mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is available from xAI. Mercury 3 is available from Inception.
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
Mercury 3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Mercury 3.
Related comparisons
More Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning comparisons
- Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Beam 1.0
- Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Muse Spark Open
- Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)