Model Comparison

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B

Comparing Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning specifies input context (2,000,000 tokens). Only Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning specifies output context (30,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning was released on 2025-08-28, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is 6 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

Aug 28, 2025

7 months ago

5mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning's cutoff date.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning (xAI) and QwQ-32B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning supports 2.0M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is developed by xAI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.