The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Grok 4 Fast leads the LLM Stats Score 31.7 to -3.2.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4 Fast leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.7 to -3.2, ranking #116 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok 4 Fast wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.7 and ranks #116 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
31.7
#116
-3.2
#349
30.7
#120
-3.2
#341
18.1
#118
6.5
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
2,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok 4 Fast
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
27.3#100
-2.4#311
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Grok 4 Fast · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

1 shared

Grok 4 Fast outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4 Fast specifies input context (2,000,000 tokens). Only Grok 4 Fast specifies output context (30,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Grok 4 Fast can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4 Fast is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Grok 4 Fast is 11 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

11mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4 Fast and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4 Fast
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Grok 4 Fast or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Grok 4 Fast leads the LLM Stats Score 31.7 to -3.2. Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4 Fast compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4 Fast and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4 Fast and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.7 vs -3.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4 Fast and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.