The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Grok 4 Fast leads the LLM Stats Score 31.7 to 23.5.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4 Fast leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.7 to 23.5, ranking #116 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok 4 Fast wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.7 and ranks #116 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
31.7
#116
23.5
#180
30.7
#120
24.7
#160
3.0
#167
12.9
#103
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
2,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok 4 Fast
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
27.3#100
25.4#110
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Grok 4 Fast · 47 for Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

3 shared

Grok 4 Fast outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SimpleQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4 Fast specifies input context (2,000,000 tokens). Only Grok 4 Fast specifies output context (30,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok 4 Fast and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4 Fast is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 1 month newer than Grok 4 Fast.

Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4 Fast and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4 Fast
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Grok 4 Fast or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Grok 4 Fast leads the LLM Stats Score 31.7 to 23.5. Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4 Fast compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4 Fast and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4 Fast and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.7 vs 23.5), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4 Fast and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.