The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B are closely matched at 40.7 and 38.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.7 and 38.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-4 Heavy wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.7
#61
38.7
#70
39.0
#65
38.5
#69
17.7
#123
22.9
#86
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.45 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-4 Heavy
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
41.5#7
36.6#38
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Grok-4 Heavy · 38 for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

3 shared

Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HMMT25, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-4 Heavy shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's cutoff date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4 Heavy
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Which is better, Grok-4 Heavy or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.7 and 38.7. Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-4 Heavy compare to Qwen3.5-397B-A17B in benchmarks?

Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.7 vs 38.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.