The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 are closely matched at 47.0 and 41.1 on the LLM Stats Score. Muse Spark 1.2 is 24.0x cheaper per token.

xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 47.0 and 41.1.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

On price, Muse Spark 1.2 is roughly 24.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.2 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.5

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output

Choose Muse Spark 1.2

  • cost matters — it's about 24.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.0
#18
41.1
#44
45.5
#26
34.4
#80
38.7
#16
33.3
#35
33.6
#20
29.3
#31
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
500,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Grok 4.5 · 3 for Muse Spark 1.2

2 shared

Grok 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.2 is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

For input processing, Grok 4.5 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.2 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok 4.5 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.2 ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.5 is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.2.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok 4.5
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.2 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok 4.5's 500,000 tokens. Only Muse Spark 1.2 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.5
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.5 was released on 2026-07-16, while Muse Spark 1.2 was released on 2026-08-05.

Muse Spark 1.2 is 1 month newer than Grok 4.5.

Grok 4.5

Jul 16, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Spark 1.2

Aug 5, 2026

3 weeks ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while Muse Spark 1.2's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.5's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.2's cutoff date.

Grok 4.5

Feb 2026

Muse Spark 1.2

Provider Availability

Grok 4.5 is available from xAI. Muse Spark 1.2 is available from Meta Model API.

Grok 4.5

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Muse Spark 1.2

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.5
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2.

Which is better, Grok 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 47.0 and 41.1. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI and Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.5 compare to Muse Spark 1.2 in benchmarks?

Grok 4.5 scores GPQA: 93.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 64.7%, AA-Omniscience Index: 63.0%, DeepSWE 1.0: 62.0%. Muse Spark 1.2 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.9%, Meta Internal Coding Bench: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 59.3%.

Is Grok 4.5 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is 20.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok 4.5 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai. Muse Spark 1.2 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2?

Grok 4.5 supports 500K tokens and Muse Spark 1.2 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.0 vs 41.1), context window (500K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.2?

Grok 4.5 is developed by xAI and Muse Spark 1.2 is developed by Meta.