The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched at 47.8 and 51.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

xAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 47.8 and 51.0.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.7
xAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.8
#30
51.0
#15
Reasoning
43.5
#47
47.5
#26
Coding
36.8
#23
38.8
#18
Agents
34.5
#24
38.0
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
— / M
Context window
500,000
—

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

3 shared

Grok 4.7 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ling 3.1 Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (CyberGym, HealthBench Professional, Terminal-Bench 4.0).

Ling 3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.7 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than Grok 4.7.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

2 weeks ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

Jun 2026

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 47.8 and 51.0. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.8 vs 51.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons