Model Comparison

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Comparing Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Grok Code Fast 1's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Code Fast 1 does not.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok Code Fast 1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok Code Fast 1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 1 month newer than Grok Code Fast 1.

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

7 months ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

6 months ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 94.0%, OCRBench: 88.1%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.1%, AI2D: 84.1%.
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (256K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.