Hermes 3 405B vs Phi 4
Hermes 3 405B and Phi 4 are closely matched at 4.3 and 5.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Phi 4 is 11.4x cheaper per token.
Nous Research · Microsoft · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Hermes 3 405B and Phi 4 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 4.3 and 5.4.
The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.
On price, Phi 4 is roughly 11.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Hermes 3 405B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Hermes 3 405B
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
Choose Phi 4
- cost matters — it's about 11.4x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Hermes 3 405B · 13 for Phi 4
Hermes 3 405B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Phi 4 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-Pro).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Hermes 3 405B ($1.00/1M tokens) is 14.3x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.07/1M tokens).
For output processing, Hermes 3 405B ($1.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.14/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Hermes 3 405B is more expensive than Phi 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Hermes 3 405B has 390.3B more parameters than Phi 4, making it 2655.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Hermes 3 405B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Phi 4's 16,384 tokens. Hermes 3 405B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Phi 4 is limited to 16,384 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Hermes 3 405B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Hermes 3 405B was released on 2024-10-09, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.
Phi 4 is 2 months newer than Hermes 3 405B.
Oct 9, 2024
1.9 years ago
Dec 12, 2024
1.8 years ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Hermes 3 405B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hermes 3 405B's cutoff date.
—
Jun 2024
Provider Availability
Hermes 3 405B is available from DeepInfra. Phi 4 is available from DeepInfra.
Hermes 3 405B
Phi 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Hermes 3 405B and Phi 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Hermes 3 405B vs Phi 4.