Hermes 3 70B vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3B leads the LLM Stats Score 17.3 to 4.0. Qwen3 30B A3B is 4.7x cheaper per token.
Nous Research · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3 30B A3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.3 to 4.0, ranking #233 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hermes 3 70B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 4.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Hermes 3 70B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Hermes 3 70B
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B
- overall performance matters — it scores 17.3 and ranks #233 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 4.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
17 reported for Hermes 3 70B · 8 for Qwen3 30B A3B
Hermes 3 70B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Hermes 3 70B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens) is 7.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Hermes 3 70B is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Hermes 3 70B has 39.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 129.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Hermes 3 70B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Hermes 3 70B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3 30B A3B is limited to 128,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.
Qwen3 30B A3B is 9 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Aug 15, 2024
2.1 years ago
Apr 29, 2025
1.4 years ago
8mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.
Hermes 3 70B
Qwen3 30B A3B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Hermes 3 70B and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Hermes 3 70B vs Qwen3 30B A3B.