The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy3 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro are closely matched at 42.6 and 35.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Hy3 is 6.0x cheaper per token.

Tencent · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.6 and 35.4.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy3 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Hy3 is roughly 6.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy3

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 6.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Hy3
Tencent
MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.6
#60
35.4
#103
Reasoning
42.7
#56
37.5
#84
Coding
32.0
#48
25.3
#85
Agents
26.5
#61
16.8
#97
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.14 / M
$1.00 / M
Output price
$0.58 / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
262,144
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Hy3
MiMo-V2-Pro
Tool use
19.5#71
18.4#80
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Hy3 · 7 for MiMo-V2-Pro

4 shared

Hy3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, DeepSearchQA, SWE-bench Multilingual), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Hy3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Hy3 costs less

For input processing, Hy3 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 7.1x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Hy3 ($0.58/1M tokens) is 5.2x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than Hy3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Tencent
Hy3
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.58
Best providerDeepinfra
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

705.0B diff

MiMo-V2-Pro has 705.0B more parameters than Hy3, making it 239.0% larger.

Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
1.0Tparameters
295.0B
Hy3
1000.0B
MiMo-V2-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Pro accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Hy3's 262,144 tokens. Hy3 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Tencent
Hy3
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy3 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2-Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

Hy3 is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

3 months ago

3mo newer
MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Hy3 is available from DeepInfra. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Hy3

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.58/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy3
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy3 vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, Hy3 or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 42.6 and 35.4. Hy3 is made by Tencent and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy3 compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

Is Hy3 cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Hy3 is 7.1x cheaper for input tokens. Hy3 costs $0.14/M input and $0.58/M output via deepinfra. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Hy3 supports 262K tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.6 vs 35.4), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.14 vs $1.00/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Hy3 is developed by Tencent and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons