The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Hy3 leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 35.5.

Tencent · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 35.5, ranking #39 overall.

In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy3 wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.9 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 9 exact shared results

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
42.9
#39
35.5
#76
42.9
#37
34.7
#77
35.0
#27
23.8
#65
28.2
#36
18.5
#63
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 9
1 of 9
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Hy3
Muse Glimmer-30B
34.6#43
28.3#84
23.2#39
18.6#59
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Hy3 · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B

9 shared

Hy3 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (DeepSearchQA, GPQA, MCP Atlas, SkillsBench, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1, WildClawBench), while Muse Glimmer-30B is better at 1 benchmark (AA-LCR).

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

265.4B diff

Hy3 has 265.4B more parameters than Muse Glimmer-30B, making it 896.6% larger.

Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
29.6Bparameters
295.0B
Hy3
29.6B
Muse Glimmer-30B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Glimmer-30B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Muse Glimmer-30B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Muse Glimmer-30B is 1 month newer than Hy3.

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

2 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Hy3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy3's cutoff date.

Hy3

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy3
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Hy3 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Hy3 leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 35.5. Hy3 is made by Tencent and Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy3 compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%.

What are the main differences between Hy3 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.9 vs 35.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy3 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Hy3 is developed by Tencent and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.