Model Comparison

Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17BWhich is better in 2026?

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B — which is better?

Hy3 (by Tencent) and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Hy3 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, IMO-AnswerBench, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Toolathlon, WideSearch), while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is better at 0 benchmarks. Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Hy3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Hy3 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, IMO-AnswerBench, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Toolathlon, WideSearch), while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

102.0B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 102.0B more parameters than Hy3, making it 34.6% larger.

Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
295.0B
Hy3
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16.

Hy3 is 5 months newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

2 weeks ago

4mo newer
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AA-LCR score (73.4% vs 68.7%)
Higher BrowseComp score (84.2% vs 69.0%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 88.4%)
Higher IMO-AnswerBench score (90.0% vs 80.9%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (75.8% vs 69.3%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 76.4%)
Higher Toolathlon score (48.5% vs 38.3%)
Higher WideSearch score (76.4% vs 74.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Tencent
Hy3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

FAQ

Common questions about Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Which is better, Hy3 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Hy3 is made by Tencent and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Hy3 compare to Qwen3.5-397B-A17B in benchmarks?

Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy3 and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy3 and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy3 and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Hy3 is developed by Tencent and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.