Inkling 2 Small vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking
Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 27.9. Inkling 2 Small is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Thinking Machines Lab · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Inkling 2 Small leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 27.9, ranking #41 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Inkling 2 Small wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Inkling 2 Small is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Inkling 2 Small also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Inkling 2 Small
- overall performance matters — it scores 47.1 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose LongCat-Flash-Thinking
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Inkling 2 Small · 14 for LongCat-Flash-Thinking
Inkling 2 Small outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while LongCat-Flash-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Inkling 2 Small significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Inkling 2 Small ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as LongCat-Flash-Thinking ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Inkling 2 Small ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Thinking ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, LongCat-Flash-Thinking is more expensive than Inkling 2 Small.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Inkling 2 Small has 34.0B more parameters than LongCat-Flash-Thinking, making it 6.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Inkling 2 Small accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to LongCat-Flash-Thinking's 128,000 tokens. Only LongCat-Flash-Thinking specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Inkling 2 Small supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Thinking does not.
Inkling 2 Small can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Inkling 2 Small
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Inkling 2 Small is licensed under a proprietary license, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Inkling 2 Small was released on 2026-11-05, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Inkling 2 Small is 14 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Thinking.
Nov 5, 2026
4 days ago
1.1yr newerSep 22, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Inkling 2 Small is available from Thinking Machines Lab. LongCat-Flash-Thinking is available from Meituan.
Inkling 2 Small
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Inkling 2 Small and LongCat-Flash-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Inkling 2 Small vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking.