Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Ember
Inkling 2 Small and Muse Ember are closely matched at 47.2 and 45.9 on the LLM Stats Score. Muse Ember is 2.4x cheaper per token.
Thinking Machines Lab · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Inkling 2 Small and Muse Ember are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 47.2 and 45.9.
On price, Muse Ember is roughly 2.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Ember also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Inkling 2 Small
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output
Choose Muse Ember
- cost matters — it's about 2.4x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Inkling 2 Small · 6 for Muse Ember
Inkling 2 Small and Muse Emberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Inkling 2 Small ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Inkling 2 Small ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Inkling 2 Small is more expensive than Muse Ember.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Ember accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Inkling 2 Small's 256,000 tokens. Only Muse Ember specifies output context (524,288 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Inkling 2 Small and Muse Ember support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Inkling 2 Small
Muse Ember
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Inkling 2 Small was released on 2026-11-05, while Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09.
Muse Ember is 0 month newer than Inkling 2 Small.
Nov 5, 2026
1 weeks ago
Nov 9, 2026
3 days ago
4d newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Inkling 2 Small is available from Thinking Machines Lab. Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API.
Inkling 2 Small
Muse Ember
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Inkling 2 Small and Muse Ember side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Ember.