The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 17.8.

Thinking Machines Lab · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Inkling 2 Small leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 17.8, ranking #41 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Inkling 2 Small wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Inkling 2 Small

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.1 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.1
#41
17.8
#254
47.8
#26
16.6
#252
36.2
#35
14.3
#166
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Inkling 2 Small · 6 for Nemotron Nano 9B v2

1 shared

Inkling 2 Small outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Inkling 2 Small significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

585.1B diff

Inkling 2 Small has 585.1B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 6574.2% larger.

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
594.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
594.0B
Inkling 2 Small
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Inkling 2 Small specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Inkling 2 Small supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Inkling 2 Small can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Inkling 2 Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Inkling 2 Small is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Inkling 2 Small

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Inkling 2 Small was released on 2026-11-05, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18.

Inkling 2 Small is 15 months newer than Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Inkling 2 Small

Nov 5, 2026

4 days ago

1.2yr newer
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Inkling 2 Small's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Inkling 2 Small's cutoff date.

Inkling 2 Small

—

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Inkling 2 Small and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Inkling 2 Small
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Which is better, Inkling 2 Small or Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 17.8. Inkling 2 Small is made by Thinking Machines Lab and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Inkling 2 Small compare to Nemotron Nano 9B v2 in benchmarks?

Inkling 2 Small scores GPQA: 93.0%, BrowseComp: 90.2%, CharXiv-R: 85.6%, MCP Atlas: 85.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 82.2%. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Inkling 2 Small and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Inkling 2 Small supports 256K tokens and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Inkling 2 Small and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.1 vs 17.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Inkling 2 Small and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Inkling 2 Small is developed by Thinking Machines Lab and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA.