The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Inkling 2 Small vs QwQ-32B

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 14.1.

Thinking Machines Lab · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Inkling 2 Small leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 14.1, ranking #41 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Inkling 2 Small wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Inkling 2 Small

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.1 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.1
#41
14.1
#277
47.8
#26
15.0
#265
36.2
#35
10.2
#199
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Inkling 2 Small · 7 for QwQ-32B

1 shared

Inkling 2 Small outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Inkling 2 Small significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

561.5B diff

Inkling 2 Small has 561.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 1727.7% larger.

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
594.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
594.0B
Inkling 2 Small
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Inkling 2 Small specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Inkling 2 Small supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Inkling 2 Small can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Inkling 2 Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Inkling 2 Small is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Inkling 2 Small

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Inkling 2 Small was released on 2026-11-05, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Inkling 2 Small is 20 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Inkling 2 Small

Nov 5, 2026

5 days ago

1.7yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Inkling 2 Small's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Inkling 2 Small's cutoff date.

Inkling 2 Small

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Inkling 2 Small and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Inkling 2 Small
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Inkling 2 Small vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Inkling 2 Small or QwQ-32B?

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 14.1. Inkling 2 Small is made by Thinking Machines Lab and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Inkling 2 Small compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Inkling 2 Small scores GPQA: 93.0%, BrowseComp: 90.2%, CharXiv-R: 85.6%, MCP Atlas: 85.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 82.2%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Inkling 2 Small and QwQ-32B?

Inkling 2 Small supports 256K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Inkling 2 Small and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.1 vs 14.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Inkling 2 Small and QwQ-32B?

Inkling 2 Small is developed by Thinking Machines Lab and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.