The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Jamba 1.5 Large vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base are closely matched at 0.9 and 0.3 on the LLM Stats Score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 23.3x cheaper per token.

AI21 Labs · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 0.9 and 0.3.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is roughly 23.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Jamba 1.5 Large also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 23.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
0.9
#321
0.3
#324
1.0
#313
0.5
#315
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$8.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
256,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Jamba 1.5 Large
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
4.4#282
4.7#279
5.3#169
5.3#168
5.3#155
5.3#154
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Jamba 1.5 Large · 5 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

3 shared

Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs less

For input processing, Jamba 1.5 Large ($2.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Jamba 1.5 Large ($8.00/1M tokens) is 26.7x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Large is more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

374.0B diff

Jamba 1.5 Large has 374.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base, making it 1558.3% larger.

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
398.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
24.0Bparameters
398.0B
Jamba 1.5 Large
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Jamba 1.5 Large accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's 128,000 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is limited to 128,000 tokens.

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Jamba 1.5 Large is licensed under Jamba Open Model License, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base was released on 2025-03-17.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 7 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

2.1 years ago

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Mar 17, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's cutoff date.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Provider Availability

Jamba 1.5 Large is available from Bedrock, Google. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is available from Mistral AI.

Jamba 1.5 Large

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Jamba 1.5 Large
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Jamba 1.5 Large vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.

Which is better, Jamba 1.5 Large or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 0.9 and 0.3. Jamba 1.5 Large is made by AI21 Labs and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Jamba 1.5 Large compare to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base in benchmarks?

Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base scores MMLU: 81.0%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MMMU: 59.3%, MMLU-Pro: 56.0%, GPQA: 37.5%.

Is Jamba 1.5 Large cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 20.0x cheaper for input tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via bedrock. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.9 vs 0.3), context window (256K vs 128K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Jamba Open Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Jamba 1.5 Large and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.