Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 leads the LLM Stats Score 36.1 to -6.1. Mercury 3 is 1.5x cheaper per token.
AI21 Labs · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mercury 3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.1 to -6.1, ranking #98 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mercury 3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Mercury 3 is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mercury 3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Mercury 3
- overall performance matters — it scores 36.1 and ranks #98 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
8 reported for Jamba 1.5 Mini · 12 for Mercury 3
Jamba 1.5 Mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mercury 3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Mercury 3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Jamba 1.5 Mini ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Jamba 1.5 Mini ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.35/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Mini is more expensive than Mercury 3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mercury 3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Jamba 1.5 Mini's 256,144 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Mini can generate longer responses up to 256,144 tokens, while Mercury 3 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Jamba 1.5 Mini is licensed under Jamba Open Model License, while Mercury 3 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Jamba Open Model License
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Jamba 1.5 Mini was released on 2024-08-22, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.
Mercury 3 is 26 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Mini.
Aug 22, 2024
2.2 years ago
Oct 19, 2026
1 days ago
2.2yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Jamba 1.5 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while Mercury 3's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Mini's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mercury 3's cutoff date.
Mar 2024
—
Provider Availability
Jamba 1.5 Mini is available from Bedrock, Google. Mercury 3 is available from Inception.
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Mercury 3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Jamba 1.5 Mini and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Mercury 3.