The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 1.7x cheaper per token.

LG AI Research · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench v6), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.60 / M
$0.45 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$3.49 / M
Context window
32,768
262,144
Released
Dec 2025
Sep 2025
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench v6), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs less

For input processing, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).

For output processing, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.5x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is more expensive than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerFriendliAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input tokens$0.45
Output tokens$3.49
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has 0.0B more parameters than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B, making it 0.0% larger.

LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
236.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
236.0Bparameters
236.0B
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's 32,768 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is limited to 32,768 tokens.

LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B was released on 2025-12-31, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Dec 31, 2025

7 months ago

3mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-10-01, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's training data extends to 2025-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's cutoff date.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Oct 2025

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Provider Availability

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is available from FriendliAI. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.45/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.49/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.98/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.95/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is made by LG AI Research and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does K-EXAONE-236B-A23B compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B scores AIME 2025: 92.8%, MMMLU: 85.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 80.7%, t2-bench: 73.2%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

Is K-EXAONE-236B-A23B cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output via friendli. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports 33K tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (33K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.45/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is developed by LG AI Research and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.